Peer Review Policy
At the Economic Sciences, we uphold the utmost dedication to the quality and precision of our published research. We firmly hold that the peer review process serves as a cornerstone in upholding the highest standards of scholarly excellence and rigor in the articles we disseminate.
Our peer review system is meticulously crafted to embody fairness, transparency, and thoroughness. Here are the pivotal aspects of our peer review protocol:
Double-Blind Review: Every submission to our journal undergoes a double-blind review, safeguarding the confidentiality of both the author(s) and the reviewers. This practice fosters an environment of impartiality and equity throughout the review process.
Expert Reviewers: We meticulously select reviewers who possess profound expertise in the subject matter of the submitted article. Our reviewers typically comprise academics, researchers, or practitioners with relevant knowledge and experience in the field.
Stringent Review Criteria: Reviewers are tasked with assessing articles based on a comprehensive set of criteria, including the originality and significance of the research, the coherence and clarity of the argument, the methodological robustness and data analysis quality, and the overall contribution to the field.
Timely Review Process: We are committed to offering authors a prompt review process, endeavoring to furnish feedback within a span of 4-6 weeks following submission.
Revision and Resubmission: In cases where an article is accepted pending revisions, authors are afforded the opportunity to revise and resubmit their work. Subsequently, we conduct a further review to ensure that the revisions have effectively addressed the reviewers' feedback.
Editorial Oversight: Our editorial team assumes responsibility for overseeing the peer review process and making final determinations regarding article acceptance or rejection for publication. Additionally, the editorial team may provide guidance and feedback to authors throughout the review process.
We firmly believe that our peer review policy constitutes an indispensable element of our steadfast commitment to disseminating research and analysis of unparalleled quality. Continuously striving for enhancement, we remain steadfast in ensuring that our peer review process retains its robustness, fairness, and transparency.