The Responsibility to Protect in the AI Era: Examining IHL and State Obligations in the Face of AI-Enabled Warfare in Ukraine
Main Article Content
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in warfare is reshaping global security and raising critical concerns under international humanitarian law (IHL) and the responsibility to protect (R2P). This study examines ai-enabled military strategies in the Ukrainian conflict, highlighting legal, ethical, and accountability challenges.AI technologies, including autonomous weapon systems and drones, enhance precision and efficiency but also pose risks such as indiscriminate harm and erosion of the principle of distinction. The absence of clear international regulations exacerbates these concerns, making it imperative to assess state responsibilities under IHL to prevent violations of proportionality and necessity. The research further explores the role of R2P in AI-driven warfare, questioning whether AI strengthens or weakens state obligations to prevent mass atrocities. To adapt to the AI era, the paper proposes legal reforms, including transparency in AI weapon deployment, accountability structures for autonomous systems, and strengthened compliance mechanisms. By using the Ukrainian conflict as a case study, this research underscores the urgent need for global cooperation to mitigate humanitarian risks while upholding legal and ethical norms in modern warfare.